
Not Rated
On Mar. 4, 1905, TR is inaugurated in Washington, D.C. with much celebration and fanfare. TR rides in an open landau on Fifteenth St., NW, escorted by mounted Rough Riders; Secret Service men and detectives walk on either side of the carriage; TR tips his hat to the crowd. Sitting beside him is Sen. John C. Spooner of Wis., Chairman of the joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. Opposite, but not clearly visible, are Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge of Mass. and Rep. John Dalzell of Penn., members of the committee. Second sequence consists of long shots of TR taking the oath of office on a platform erected on the east front of the Capitol; Chief Justice Melville Weston Fuller (1888-1910) administers the Presidential oath of office as Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court James H. McKenney holds the Bible. The platform is decorated with plants and garlands and a large banner with the American eagle on it hangs from the center of the railing.
On Mar. 4, 1905, TR is inaugurated in Washington, D.C. with much celebration and fanfare. TR rides in an open landau on Fifteenth St., NW, escorted by mounted Rough Riders; Secret Service men and detectives walk on either side of the carriage; TR tips his hat to the crowd. Sitting beside him is Sen. John C. Spooner of Wis., Chairman of the joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. Opposite, but not clearly visible, are Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge of Mass. and Rep. John Dalzell of Penn., members of the committee. Second sequence consists of long shots of TR taking the oath of office on a platform erected on the east front of the Capitol; Chief Justice Melville Weston Fuller (1888-1910) administers the Presidential oath of office as Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court James H. McKenney holds the Bible. The platform is decorated with plants and garlands and a large banner with the American eagle on it hangs from the center of the railing.
This film is rated neutral due to the complete lack of specific plot details, making any objective assessment of political bias impossible. The historical context of a 1906 silent film about a curate suggests a focus on individual morality or social dynamics rather than modern ideological conflicts.
This early 20th-century film reflects the traditional casting and narrative conventions of its era. Its representation primarily features mainstream actors, and the storyline does not engage with critiques of traditional identities or explicit diversity, equity, and inclusion themes.
The film satirizes the hypocrisy of a Christian clergyman, depicting a curate engaging in un-clerical behavior. This comedic exposé critiques the institution or its representatives by highlighting their human failings, thus casting a negative light on the public religious role.
This early silent comedy focuses on the humorous misadventures of a curate. The narrative does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes, resulting in a determination of N/A for its portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film features a male curate, consistent with the historical and canonical understanding of the role. There is no evidence of any character established as one gender being portrayed as another.
This 1905 film is an original production, not an adaptation of existing material or a biopic. There are no prior canonical or historical racial depictions for its characters to be compared against, thus no race swap can be identified.