Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
While the employee Ali is heading to the company’s branch in Ismailia in his own car, he witnesses an accident on the road in which a cyclist loses his balance, so Ali stops to check on the injured, but he's shocked by t...
While the employee Ali is heading to the company’s branch in Ismailia in his own car, he witnesses an accident on the road in which a cyclist loses his balance, so Ali stops to check on the injured, but he's shocked by t...
The film's title, 'We, the Accused,' presents a universal dilemma of justice and judgment. Without any further narrative details, the core conflict of accusation and the pursuit of fairness remains ideologically neutral, making it impossible to discern a specific political bias.
Due to the absence of specific casting or narrative details for 'We, the Accused', the movie is assessed as having a neutral stance on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. There is no explicit evidence of either traditional casting/narrative or intentional DEI-driven elements.
No information regarding the plot or characters of "We, the Accused" was provided. Therefore, it is not possible to evaluate the film's portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters or themes, resulting in an N/A rating.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1980 TV adaptation of Ernest Raymond's 1935 novel "We, the Accused" maintains the original genders of its established characters. No instances of a character canonically or historically established as one gender being portrayed as a different gender were found.
The 1980 television film "We, the Accused" is an adaptation of a 1935 British novel. The characters, originally conceived as white, are portrayed by actors of the same race in the adaptation, with no instances of race swapping identified.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources