Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
A huge fly is bothering an old gentleman, who is trying to take a nap. The old gentleman, after standing the torment as long as he can, jumps up and taking a shot-gun, fires at the fly and blows it to pieces, then goes back to bed to sleep in peace. The idea is a very good one, and is very well worked out.
A huge fly is bothering an old gentleman, who is trying to take a nap. The old gentleman, after standing the torment as long as he can, jumps up and taking a shot-gun, fires at the fly and blows it to pieces, then goes back to bed to sleep in peace. The idea is a very good one, and is very well worked out.
The film's subject matter, a man attempting to swat a fly, is entirely apolitical and lacks any discernible ideological context or message. The narrative focuses solely on a trivial, personal conflict and its resolution, offering no commentary on broader societal or political issues.
This early silent film features a single male character, consistent with traditional casting practices of its era. The narrative presents a simple comedic premise without engaging with themes of diversity, equity, or inclusion, and does not critically portray traditional identities.
The film 'The Troublesome Fly' is a brief silent comedy from 1900. Its narrative focuses solely on a man's attempt to catch a fly, and it does not feature any LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or related plot elements. Therefore, there is no LGBTQ+ portrayal to evaluate within this film.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This early silent film features an original character, a man, created specifically for the short. There is no prior source material or historical figure whose gender could have been altered.
This early silent film features a man attempting to swat a fly. There are no named characters, no pre-existing source material, and no historical figures involved, meaning no character had an established race prior to this film's creation.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources