When Marie St. Clair believes she has been jilted by her artist fiance Jean, she decides to leave for Paris on her own. After spending a year in the city as a mistress of the wealthy Pierre Revel, she is reunited with Jean by chance. This leaves her with the choice between a glamorous life in Paris, and the true love she left behind.
When Marie St. Clair believes she has been jilted by her artist fiance Jean, she decides to leave for Paris on her own. After spending a year in the city as a mistress of the wealthy Pierre Revel, she is reunited with Jean by chance. This leaves her with the choice between a glamorous life in Paris, and the true love she left behind.
The film explores social class disparity and the moral compromises individuals face, particularly women, within a stratified society. While depicting issues often critiqued by the Left, its resolution emphasizes individual moral integrity and personal escape rather than advocating for systemic political change, leading to a neutral rating.
This 1923 silent film features a cast predominantly composed of white actors, reflecting the traditional casting practices of its era without intentional diversity or race/gender swaps. The narrative explores a social drama set in Parisian high society, focusing on themes of love and class, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or incorporating modern DEI themes as central to its plot.
The film 'A Woman of Paris: A Drama of Fate' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative centers entirely on heterosexual relationships and the social challenges faced by its protagonist, resulting in no depiction of queer identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
A Woman of Paris: A Drama of Fate is an original film from 1923. Its characters were created for this specific production, meaning there are no pre-existing canonical or historical figures whose gender could have been altered.
As an original silent film from 1923, "A Woman of Paris" introduced its characters without prior canonical or historical racial establishments. Therefore, no character could have been portrayed as a different race than originally established.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources