Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
An audit by the Internal Revenue Service about overdue taxes reveals that the supposedly incredibly wealthy Pruitts family is in fact broke. Presumably causing the economic depression, an improbably charitable IRS allows them to continue living in their mansion and maintaining the pretensions of great wealth.
An audit by the Internal Revenue Service about overdue taxes reveals that the supposedly incredibly wealthy Pruitts family is in fact broke. Presumably causing the economic depression, an improbably charitable IRS allows them to continue living in their mansion and maintaining the pretensions of great wealth.
The film is a comedic social satire focused on a family's farcical attempts to hide their financial ruin, offering a critique of social superficiality and class distinctions without promoting a specific political ideology or solution.
This 1966 comedy features a predominantly white cast in traditional roles, reflecting common casting practices of its era. The narrative focuses on social satire without explicitly critiquing or negatively portraying traditional identities, maintaining a neutral or positive framing within its comedic context.
The 1960s sitcom "The Pruitts of Southampton" does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on the comedic misadventures of a wealthy family pretending to be poor, with no elements related to queer identity or experiences present in the series.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1966 television series "The Pruitts of Southampton" is an adaptation of the novel "House Party." There is no evidence that any character canonically established as one gender in the source material was portrayed as a different gender in the show.
Based on available information for 'The Pruitts of Southampton' (1966) and its source material, there are no instances where a character canonically established as one race was portrayed by an actor of a different race.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources