Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Johnny Kovak joins the Teamsters trade-union in a local chapter in the 1930s and works his way up in the organization. As he climbs higher and higher his methods become more ruthless and finally senator Madison starts a campaign to find the truth about the alleged connections with the Mob.
Johnny Kovak joins the Teamsters trade-union in a local chapter in the 1930s and works his way up in the organization. As he climbs higher and higher his methods become more ruthless and finally senator Madison starts a campaign to find the truth about the alleged connections with the Mob.
The film's central narrative focuses on the struggle for labor rights and the formation of a powerful union, aligning with progressive values of anti-exploitation and collective action. However, it critically examines the moral compromises and corruption that infiltrate the movement, leading to a nuanced, left-leaning perspective.
The movie features a predominantly white and mainstream cast, consistent with the historical period and subject matter of the labor movement. Its narrative centers on the struggles of a white male protagonist and does not explicitly critique traditional identities or prioritize DEI themes.
The film "F.I.S.T." does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative is centered on the rise and fall of a labor union leader, focusing on industrial politics, crime, and power dynamics without incorporating any queer representation.
The film is a historical drama centered on union activities and organized crime. Female characters primarily serve in supportive or romantic roles and are not depicted engaging in or winning close-quarters physical combat against male opponents.
F.I.S.T. is an original screenplay, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters. Its characters, though inspired by historical figures, were created for this film, thus precluding any gender swaps as per the definition.
F.I.S.T. (1978) features original characters or fictionalized versions without a prior established race in source material or history. There is no evidence of a character being canonically or historically established as one race and then portrayed as a different race in the film.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources