Two dogs, Rowf and Snitter, struggle to survive in the countryside after escaping from an animal research laboratory. They are pursued by search parties and then the military after rumors spread that they could be carrying the bubonic plague.
Two dogs, Rowf and Snitter, struggle to survive in the countryside after escaping from an animal research laboratory. They are pursued by search parties and then the military after rumors spread that they could be carrying the bubonic plague.
The film's central thesis explicitly promotes animal welfare and critiques the systemic cruelty of scientific experimentation and unchecked institutional power, aligning with progressive ideology.
The film primarily features animated animal characters, rendering traditional human casting diversity metrics largely inapplicable. Its narrative critiques human cruelty and institutional power, but this critique is directed at actions and systems rather than explicitly targeting or negatively framing specific traditional human identities based on race or gender.
The film "The Plague Dogs" focuses on the harrowing escape and survival of two dogs from an animal research facility. Its narrative centers on themes of animal cruelty, friendship, and the struggle for freedom. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or plotlines present in the film.
The film focuses on two male dog protagonists and their struggle for survival. There are no significant female characters, human or animal, who engage in or win close-quarters physical combat against male opponents.
The animated film "The Plague Dogs" faithfully adapts its source novel. All major characters, including Rowf, Snitter, and The Tod, retain their established genders from Richard Adams' book, with no instances of gender alteration.
The film's primary characters are animals (dogs), who do not possess human racial characteristics. Human characters are minor, and their race was not a canonically established element in the source material that could be subject to a race swap.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources