In 1943, the United States tests an anti-radar system to make the U.S. Navy ships invisible to the enemy. Dr. James Longstreet uses his experiment in the destroyer escort USS Eldridge that disappears from Philadelphia. T...
In 1943, the United States tests an anti-radar system to make the U.S. Navy ships invisible to the enemy. Dr. James Longstreet uses his experiment in the destroyer escort USS Eldridge that disappears from Philadelphia. T...
The film's central conflict revolves around a military experiment gone awry and its time-bending consequences, which serves primarily as a sci-fi thriller plot device rather than a vehicle for explicit political commentary. The narrative focuses on individual heroism and a love story, leading to a neutral rating.
The movie features a predominantly white main cast, reflecting traditional casting norms of its era, without any explicit race or gender swaps of established roles. Its narrative focuses on a sci-fi premise without offering critical portrayals of traditional identities or making DEI themes central to its plot.
The Philadelphia Experiment does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative is entirely focused on its science fiction premise and heterosexual relationships, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
The film features Allison Hayes as the primary female character. Her role is supportive, assisting the male protagonists in understanding their situation and evading capture. She does not engage in or win any direct physical combat against male opponents.
The film introduces original characters for its narrative, rather than adapting pre-existing, gender-defined individuals from established source material, prior installments, or historical records. Therefore, no gender swaps are present.
The film is based on an urban legend, not a source with canonically established character races or specific historical figures. The main characters were original to this film's narrative, thus no race swaps occurred.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources