Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
It's all in a days work for the man inside the photo booth at a train station; His crush, unnerving children, clowns and murder.
It's all in a days work for the man inside the photo booth at a train station; His crush, unnerving children, clowns and murder.
The film's central focus on the concept of an external, arbitrary resolution to conflict, as implied by its title, does not inherently promote a specific political ideology. Without further plot details, the narrative is presumed to explore universal storytelling elements, resulting in a neutral rating.
Based on the absence of specific details regarding the movie's casting or narrative, the film is presumed to adopt a neutral stance on diversity and inclusion. It is assumed to feature a generally diverse cast without explicit DEI-driven character changes, and its narrative is not expected to explicitly critique traditional identities or make DEI themes overtly central.
The film uses the 'Deus ex machina' trope to critique the concept of divine intervention, portraying Christian characters' reliance on miraculous solutions as naive or ultimately unfulfilled, thereby questioning the efficacy of such faith in problem-solving.
Based on the information provided, the film 'Deus ex machina' does not appear to feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Therefore, its net impact on LGBTQ+ portrayal is considered N/A.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "Deus ex machina" (1994) is a fictional title with no established source material or prior adaptations. Without a pre-existing canon, no characters can be identified as having a gender established before this film's creation, thus precluding a gender swap.
Without information regarding the source material, established character races, or the cast of "Deus ex machina" (1994), it is impossible to identify any instances of a character's race being changed from a prior depiction. Therefore, no race swap can be confirmed.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources