In 1821 Old California, mysterious black-caped masked avenger of the oppressed, Don Diego de la Vega--Zorro--lands in jail after once again humiliating the evil Spanish governor Don Rafael Montero. With his only daughter...
In 1821 Old California, mysterious black-caped masked avenger of the oppressed, Don Diego de la Vega--Zorro--lands in jail after once again humiliating the evil Spanish governor Don Rafael Montero. With his only daughter...
The film's central conflict critiques tyrannical oppression and champions the common people's fight for freedom and justice against corrupt elites, aligning with progressive values despite employing individual vigilantism as its primary solution.
The movie features a cast that reflects its 19th-century Spanish colonial California setting, with a mix of European and Hispanic actors. Its narrative strongly critiques traditional power structures, explicitly portraying white European male antagonists as oppressive figures against the local population, making this critique central to the story.
The Mask of Zorro does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative is centered on traditional heterosexual relationships and adventure, resulting in no portrayal of queer identity within the film's storyline.
The film features Elena Montero as the primary female character involved in action sequences. While she engages in sword fights with male characters, she does not achieve a clear victory over them in direct physical combat. No other female characters participate in combat roles.
The film features the established male character Zorro and introduces new characters. No character who was canonically, historically, or widely established as one gender is portrayed on screen as a different gender.
The film introduces new characters, but the established characters like Don Diego de la Vega align racially with their canonical and historical depictions. No characters were portrayed by an actor of a different race than their established background.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources