Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Many adventures befell a beautiful dog named Michael. He was stolen and sold many times, he lived with both kind and cruel owners, and even performed in the circus arena. And so, during his difficult wanderings, Michael ...
Many adventures befell a beautiful dog named Michael. He was stolen and sold many times, he lived with both kind and cruel owners, and even performed in the circus arena. And so, during his difficult wanderings, Michael ...
The film's genre as a children's musical fantasy about a talking animal, focusing on universal themes of friendship and self-discovery, inherently lacks explicit or implicit political messaging, leading to a neutral rating.
The film, a 1969 Soviet Latvian children's musical, features traditional casting with local actors, consistent with its historical and cultural context. Its narrative, typical for a fairy tale of that era, does not include critical portrayals of traditional identities or explicit DEI themes.
The evaluation of LGBTQ+ portrayal for 'Suns kurs prata dziedat' cannot be completed as no film content or narrative details were supplied for analysis. Without this information, it's impossible to determine the presence or nature of LGBTQ+ themes.
The film is a children's musical and does not contain any scenes depicting physical combat or action sequences. Consequently, no female characters are shown engaging in or winning close-quarters physical fights against male opponents.
This 1991 Latvian animated film is based on a children's book. There is no widely known source material or historical context indicating that any established character's gender was altered for this adaptation.
This 1991 Latvian film, "The Dog Who Knew How to Sing," does not appear to be an adaptation of a work with pre-established character races, nor is it a biopic or reboot. There is no evidence of any character being canonically, historically, or widely established as one race and then portrayed as another.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources