1.9
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Korea Patrol (1951)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 1.9
Overview
When notified of the North Korean invasion of South Korea, an American officer assigned to the Republic of Korea Army leads a mixed American and South Korean six man patrol to blow up a strategic bridge to delay the enemy's advance.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Christianity: Positive
Overview
When notified of the North Korean invasion of South Korea, an American officer assigned to the Republic of Korea Army leads a mixed American and South Korean six man patrol to blow up a strategic bridge to delay the enemy's advance.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Traditional
Primary
The film's likely focus on American soldiers' duty, sacrifice, and patriotism during the Korean War, released amidst the conflict, aligns with conservative values of national defense and military strength, positioning it as right-leaning.
The movie features traditional casting for its primary American military roles, consistent with war films from the early 1950s. The narrative frames traditional identities in a neutral or positive manner, without incorporating critical portrayals or explicit DEI themes.
Secondary
The film likely portrays Christianity as a vital source of comfort and moral strength for soldiers facing the horrors of war, affirming its role in providing hope and resilience. Characters may find solace in prayer or display symbols of faith, with the narrative supporting these expressions as beneficial.
Based on the information provided, no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes are present in 'Korea Patrol'. Consequently, an evaluation of its portrayal of LGBTQ+ elements cannot be conducted.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Korea Patrol (1951) is an original film, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters. Therefore, all characters are new creations for this specific film, and no gender swaps can occur according to the provided definition.
This 1951 film features original characters created for the movie, rather than adapting pre-existing source material or historical figures with established racial identities. Therefore, no race swaps occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
3.7
N/A
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.8
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
(1969)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.9
Sweet Smell of Success
(1957)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.2
Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
Sunset Boulevard
(1950)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The General
(1926)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.9
The Dark Knight
(2008)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.2
Once Upon a Time in America
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Reservoir Dogs
(1992)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Spider-Man
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Apollo 13
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Terminator
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.6
Rebecca
(1940)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.6
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Good Earth
(1937)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
The Return of Frank Cannon
(1980)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
9.1
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Female Combat: Yes
Center
8.2
Mystic River
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Great Race
(1965)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.3
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
(2005)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
Bridge to Terabithia
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low