Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Having entered the institute, the hero of the film, along with his new comrades, goes to the village "for potatoes". A month spent in the "open air" not only fills the life of a spoiled urban youth with interesting acqua...
Having entered the institute, the hero of the film, along with his new comrades, goes to the village "for potatoes". A month spent in the "open air" not only fills the life of a spoiled urban youth with interesting acqua...
The film's realistic and melancholic portrayal of the inefficiencies and human cost of Soviet collective farming, leading to individual disillusionment, subtly critiques a system strongly associated with left-wing economic models, thus aligning with right-leaning skepticism.
This 1986 Soviet drama features traditional casting, reflecting the prevalent demographics and filmmaking practices of its era, with no intentional race or gender swaps. The narrative focuses on individual experiences within a specific socio-political context, without engaging in critical portrayals of traditional identities or centering on modern diversity, equity, and inclusion themes.
This film does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on a young woman's experiences on a collective farm in the Soviet Union, with no elements related to queer identity or issues.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "Sentimentalnoe puteshestvie na kartoshku" is an original Soviet drama from 1986. Its characters were created for this specific production and do not derive from prior source material or historical figures with established genders. Therefore, no character undergoes a gender swap.
This Soviet-era drama is an adaptation of a Russian novel, featuring characters consistent with the setting and source material's implied racial background. There is no evidence of any character, canonically or historically established as one race, being portrayed as a different race.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources