Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Takarazuka is a gym teacher who wants to work in a girls high school in the worst way, and of course, for the worst reasons. He finally lands his dream job on a remote island with an overabundance of beautiful and nubile young girls. Can he win their hearts despite his hair trigger problem?
Takarazuka is a gym teacher who wants to work in a girls high school in the worst way, and of course, for the worst reasons. He finally lands his dream job on a remote island with an overabundance of beautiful and nubile young girls. Can he win their hearts despite his hair trigger problem?
Based solely on the title and director, without any plot details or thematic information, the film's focus on a performance troupe is considered inherently apolitical, resulting in a neutral bias rating.
The movie showcases the Takarazuka Revue, an all-female Japanese musical theater troupe where women perform all roles, including male characters, representing a significant and intentional gender-based casting approach. The narrative focuses on presenting this unique theatrical tradition without explicitly critiquing traditional identities.
The film 'Oh! Takarazuka' does not contain any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes within its story. Consequently, there is no portrayal to assess, leading to a net impact rating of N/A.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film documents the Takarazuka Revue, an all-female Japanese musical theater troupe known for women playing male roles (otokoyaku). This performance style is the established format of the revue itself, not a gender swap of a character from external source material introduced by the film.
This film is a documentary/performance piece about the Takarazuka Revue, an all-female Japanese musical theater troupe. The performers are exclusively Japanese, and the film does not adapt source material with pre-established characters of a different race. Therefore, no race swap occurs.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources