Mild-mannered timid businessman Dave Buznik works for a pet clothing company out of New York City. He's got an abrasive boss named Mr. Frank Head who frequently takes credit for his work and steps on him in return. He's ...
Mild-mannered timid businessman Dave Buznik works for a pet clothing company out of New York City. He's got an abrasive boss named Mr. Frank Head who frequently takes credit for his work and steps on him in return. He's ...
The film's central focus is on an individual's journey to manage anger and assertiveness through unconventional therapy, rather than engaging with broader political or systemic issues, leading to a neutral rating.
The movie features a predominantly white main cast, with some visible diversity in supporting roles, but without explicit race or gender swaps of traditionally white characters. The narrative focuses on a white male protagonist's personal growth and does not critically portray traditional identities or center explicit DEI themes.
The film features a gay character, Chuck, whose identity is largely reduced to a comedic device. His advances towards the protagonist are consistently played for laughs, creating awkward situations for the straight lead. This portrayal lacks dignity and complexity, primarily using his sexuality as a source of discomfort and humor without positive counter-balance, resulting in a net negative impact.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Anger Management (2003) is an original film with characters created specifically for this production. There is no prior source material, historical figures, or legacy characters from which a gender swap could occur.
Anger Management (2003) is an original film with characters created specifically for this production. There is no prior source material, historical figures, or previous installments from which character races could have been established and subsequently altered. Therefore, no race swaps occurred.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources