Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Behind the high walls of the old Indian monastery, some businessmen organized a closed school of the occult sciences. The most capable student, the young man Ariel, who has the ability to levitate, once decides to escape...
Behind the high walls of the old Indian monastery, some businessmen organized a closed school of the occult sciences. The most capable student, the young man Ariel, who has the ability to levitate, once decides to escape...
Due to the complete absence of specific plot details, character arcs, or thematic information for 'Ariel' by Yevgeni Kotov, a definitive political bias cannot be assessed. The rating of 0 reflects an inability to determine bias rather than an active portrayal of neutrality or balance within the film itself.
Due to the absence of specific casting details or narrative information for 'Ariel' by Yevgeni Kotov, the film is assessed based on default assumptions. There is no indication of explicit DEI-driven casting or narrative themes, leading to an evaluation that does not identify significant engagement with diversity, equity, and inclusion characteristics.
Due to the lack of accessible information about the film 'Ariel' by Yevgeni Kotov, it is not possible to evaluate its portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Therefore, the net impact is classified as N/A, as no depiction can be identified.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "Ariel" (1992) by Yevgeni Kotov lacks widely established source material or prior character canon. Without a baseline of pre-existing character genders, it is not possible to identify any instances of a gender swap.
The film "Ariel" (1992) is an adaptation of a Russian novel. There is no widely established racial canon for its characters, nor is there readily available information indicating a character's race was explicitly changed from a prior, unambiguous depiction in the source material. Thus, it does not meet the definition of a race swap.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources