From polar bears in the arctic tundra to black bears in the Northern Rockies, you'll see some of the most spectacular footage ever shot of these enterprising omnivores. Catch salmon with a group of hungry grizzlies on the McNeil River in Alaska. Crawl inside a den with a mother black bear and her cubs. Learn about the challenges facing each of these species as their habitat diminishes.
From polar bears in the arctic tundra to black bears in the Northern Rockies, you'll see some of the most spectacular footage ever shot of these enterprising omnivores. Catch salmon with a group of hungry grizzlies on the McNeil River in Alaska. Crawl inside a den with a mother black bear and her cubs. Learn about the challenges facing each of these species as their habitat diminishes.
The film's central focus on the apolitical themes of animal survival, maternal instinct, and natural cycles in the wilderness, without explicit political advocacy or critique, results in a neutral rating.
This nature documentary primarily focuses on animal subjects, which makes traditional human casting diversity metrics largely inapplicable. Its narrative centers on the natural world without engaging in portrayals or critiques of traditional human identities or explicit DEI themes.
The film "Bears" is a DisneyNature documentary focusing on a bear family's survival in the Alaskan wilderness. It does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes, therefore, the portrayal is N/A.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
As a nature documentary, "Bears" (2004) features real animals rather than fictional or historical characters with established canonical genders from source material or prior adaptations. Therefore, the concept of a gender swap does not apply.
The film "Bears" is a nature documentary focusing on animal subjects. The concept of "race swap" as defined, which applies to human or anthropomorphic characters with established racial identities, is not applicable to animals in a documentary setting.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources