3.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Adventures in South America (1946)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Center
Viewer Rating
Rating: 3.0
Overview
Narrated travelogue covering the Andes Mountains portion of Bolivia, and three very different areas of Peru, the traditional cities of the Andes Mountains, the modern cities of the coastal plains, and the upper Amazon jungle.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Christianity: Positive
Overview
Narrated travelogue covering the Andes Mountains portion of Bolivia, and three very different areas of Peru, the traditional cities of the Andes Mountains, the modern cities of the coastal plains, and the upper Amazon jungle.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Center
Primary
The film is rated as neutral because, based solely on its title and director, it appears to be a travelogue or documentary focused on observation and information, lacking any specific plot or thematic details to suggest an explicit political agenda or bias.
This 1947 documentary naturally features diverse indigenous populations as its subjects, reflecting the regions explored rather than intentional DEI-driven casting. The narrative presents traditional identities without critique, consistent with the travelogue genre of its era.
Secondary
The film, as a 1946 travelogue, likely portrays Christianity as a significant and respected aspect of South American culture, showcasing its presence in communities and traditions without critical commentary. It is presented as an integral part of the cultural landscape.
Based on the available information, the film 'Adventures in South America' does not contain identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes, precluding an assessment of its portrayal within the given framework.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This 1946 film is a documentary/travelogue. It does not adapt pre-existing fictional characters or historical figures whose gender could be swapped. The individuals featured are presented as themselves, not as reimagined versions of established characters.
This 1946 film is a documentary/travelogue, not an adaptation of existing material with established characters or a biopic of specific historical figures. Therefore, the concept of a 'race swap' as defined does not apply.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
6.0
N/A
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Center
6.9
The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.1
Apollo 13
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.6
Rebecca
(1940)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.2
Once Upon a Time in America
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Reservoir Dogs
(1992)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Spider-Man
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Great Race
(1965)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Terminator
(1984)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
8.8
The Shawshank Redemption
(1994)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Negative
Center
8.2
Mystic River
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.9
The Dark Knight
(2008)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Center
7.7
Erin Brockovich
(2000)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low
Leans Progressive
8.0
Minority Report
(2002)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
8.2
Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
The Return of Frank Cannon
(1980)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Good Earth
(1937)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Center
9.1
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Female Combat: Yes
Traditional
7.3
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
(2005)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Center
8.4
Monsters, Inc.
(2001)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low