In Georgia's dusty Hazzard County, the close-knit Duke cousins, Bo and Luke, deliver Uncle Jesse's fine moonshine. Zooming down the rough backwoods on their powerful muscle-car--the tangerine 1969 Dodge Charger, General ...
In Georgia's dusty Hazzard County, the close-knit Duke cousins, Bo and Luke, deliver Uncle Jesse's fine moonshine. Zooming down the rough backwoods on their powerful muscle-car--the tangerine 1969 Dodge Charger, General ...
The film's central narrative champions individual liberty, property rights, and skepticism of government authority against corrupt officials, set within a traditional Southern cultural context, aligning with conservative values.
The movie features a predominantly traditional cast with no explicit race or gender swaps of established roles. Its narrative focuses on classic action-comedy themes without engaging in critical portrayals of traditional identities or incorporating explicit DEI themes.
The film 'The Dukes of Hazzard' (2005) does not include any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative focuses on the heterosexual relationships and adventures of the main characters, with no elements that could be interpreted as an LGBTQ+ portrayal, either positive, negative, or neutral.
The film features Daisy Duke as the primary female character. While she participates in car chases and uses her charm, there are no scenes depicting her engaging in or winning direct physical combat against one or more male opponents.
The 2005 film adaptation retains the established genders for all its main characters from the original television series, including Bo, Luke, Daisy, Uncle Jesse, and Boss Hogg. No canonical characters were portrayed as a different gender.
The 2005 film adaptation of "The Dukes of Hazzard" maintains the established racial portrayals of its core characters from the original television series. All major characters, including Bo, Luke, Daisy, and Uncle Jesse Duke, are portrayed by actors of the same race as their canonical counterparts.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources