The Devil Wears Prada (2006)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Right
Viewer Rating
Rating: 7.0
Overview
In New York, the simple and naive just-graduated in journalism Andrea Sachs is hired to work as the second assistant of the powerful and sophisticated Miranda Priestly, the ruthless and merciless executive of the Runway ...
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Overview
In New York, the simple and naive just-graduated in journalism Andrea Sachs is hired to work as the second assistant of the powerful and sophisticated Miranda Priestly, the ruthless and merciless executive of the Runway ...
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Right
Primary
The film's core conflict revolves around an individual's struggle with a demanding corporate environment and the solution championed is a personal choice to prioritize self-worth over professional prestige, making its themes largely apolitical and focused on individual agency.
The movie features a predominantly traditional cast without intentional race or gender swaps for established roles. Its narrative maintains a neutral or positive framing of traditional identities, with no explicit critique of white or male characters, and DEI themes are not central to the story.
Secondary
The film features Nigel, a character widely interpreted as gay, portrayed with dignity and complexity. However, his implied queer identity is not explicitly addressed or central to the narrative, nor does the film actively explore or validate LGBTQ+ themes. The portrayal is neither overtly affirming nor problematic, resulting in a neutral net impact on LGBTQ+ representation.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film "The Devil Wears Prada" is a direct adaptation of the novel. All major characters, including Andrea Sachs, Miranda Priestly, and Nigel, maintain their established genders from the source material. There are no instances of a character being portrayed as a different gender than originally established.
The film is an adaptation of a novel. There are no major characters in the source material who were explicitly or unambiguously established as one race and then portrayed as a different race in the film.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
7.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
User Ratings
7.0
7.4
Critic Ratings
7.5
6.2
More Like This
Leans Right
6.6
Hope Springs
(2012)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.6
August: Osage County
(2013)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
7.2
Forgetting Sarah Marshall
(2008)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.4
Lost in Translation
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.5
In Her Shoes
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.9
In Good Company
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.8
My Dog Skip
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.1
Little Miss Sunshine
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.8
Something's Gotta Give
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
6.5
We Bought a Zoo
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
7.2
Matchstick Men
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.4
Sideways
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.0
A Real Pain
(2024)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Strong Right
6.9
Barbershop
(2002)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Right
7.9
High Fidelity
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
8.4
Almost Famous
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
7.4
Wonder Boys
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
7.6
About a Boy
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Right
7.7
The Royal Tenenbaums
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low