Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
A political comedy with scenes of slander and libel, filmed by A. Tsutsunava, considered lost.
A political comedy with scenes of slander and libel, filmed by A. Tsutsunava, considered lost.
The film's central subject matter, the depiction of traditional Georgian folk theatre, lacks an inherent political valence within the mainstream US context, and without specific plot details, no clear left or right-leaning themes can be definitively identified.
The movie features casting that is traditional for its cultural context, reflecting the local population without intentional race or gender swaps for DEI purposes. Its narrative focuses on a traditional folk masquerade, presenting the cultural practice in a neutral or positive light without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or centering DEI themes.
The film, a documentary of the Keenoba folk tradition, depicts satirical performances that historically targeted Christian clergy. By presenting these portrayals without a counter-narrative or critique of the satire itself, the film's depiction of Christian institutions or adherents aligns with a negative portrayal, emphasizing their susceptibility to ridicule.
Berikaoba-Keenoba, a 1927 Georgian silent film, is a traditional folk comedy focused on a heterosexual love story and cultural performances. The narrative contains no discernible LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes, thus offering no specific portrayal of queer identity.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Information on specific character canonical genders from source material for this 1909 film is unavailable. Without clear evidence of a character established as one gender being portrayed as another, a gender swap cannot be confirmed.
There is no widely available information indicating that characters in the 1909 film "Berikaoba-Keenoba" had a previously established canonical or historical race that was altered for this production. Therefore, no race swaps can be identified.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources