Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Mary Morstan has received a pearl in the post every year since her father's disappearance. This leads Holmes and Watson to the truth about a secret pact between four convicts during the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
Mary Morstan has received a pearl in the post every year since her father's disappearance. This leads Holmes and Watson to the truth about a secret pact between four convicts during the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
The film is primarily a classic detective story focused on individual crime, greed, and the pursuit of justice through individual intellect, rather than explicitly promoting or critiquing specific political ideologies or systemic issues. The colonial backdrop serves as context for personal drama, not as a central political statement.
This adaptation of 'The Sign of Four' features traditional casting without explicit race or gender swaps for established roles. While the narrative includes elements of colonial history as a backdrop to the mystery, it does not center on an explicit critique of traditional identities.
The film 'The Sign of Four' does not include any explicit or implicit LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on the mystery plot and character development without incorporating elements related to queer identity or experiences, resulting in no discernible LGBTQ+ portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The 1987 film adaptation of Arthur Conan Doyle's novel "The Sign of Four" maintains the established genders of all major characters from the source material, including Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Watson, Mary Morstan, and the antagonists.
All major characters in the 1987 film adaptation of "The Sign of Four" maintain their established racial portrayals from the original source material. No character canonically or widely established as one race is depicted as a different race.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources