On their way through the Battle Frontier, Ash and friends meet up with a Pokémon Ranger who's mission is to deliever the egg of Manaphy to a temple on the ocean's floor. However, a greedy pirate wants the power of Manaphy to himself.
On their way through the Battle Frontier, Ash and friends meet up with a Pokémon Ranger who's mission is to deliever the egg of Manaphy to a temple on the ocean's floor. However, a greedy pirate wants the power of Manaphy to himself.
The film's central narrative champions environmental conservation and the protection of unique species and habitats from greedy exploitation, aligning with progressive values.
The movie, a Japanese animated production, features character designs typical of anime, which include diverse appearances but are not based on explicit racial recasting of 'traditionally white roles.' Its narrative focuses on an adventure to protect a mythical creature and does not contain any critical portrayal of traditional identities or explicit DEI themes.
The film 'Pokémon Ranger and the Temple of the Sea' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters, relationships, or themes. Its narrative is centered on adventure, friendship, and environmental protection within the Pokémon universe, with no elements pertaining to queer identity.
The film features female characters such as May, Lizabeth, and Judy. However, none of these characters engage in or win direct physical combat against male opponents. Their roles are primarily supportive or involve the use of Pokémon, not hand-to-hand or melee weapon fights.
This film features established Pokémon characters who maintain their canonical genders. New characters introduced in the movie do not appear to be gender-swapped versions of pre-existing characters from the franchise.
This animated film is part of a Japanese franchise. Its characters, both recurring and new, do not have a canonically established real-world race in their source material, making a "race swap" inapplicable under the provided definition.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources