Rango is a pet chameleon always on the lookout for action and adventure, except the fake kind, where he directs it and acts in it. After a car accident, he winds up in an old western town called Dirt. What this town need...
Rango is a pet chameleon always on the lookout for action and adventure, except the fake kind, where he directs it and acts in it. After a car accident, he winds up in an old western town called Dirt. What this town need...
The film's central conflict, a critique of environmental exploitation and resource hoarding by a powerful, corrupt figure, aligns with progressive concerns about unchecked corporate power and ecological balance, leading to a left-leaning rating.
The movie features animal characters, which inherently sidesteps direct human racial or gender representation in its roles. The voice cast is largely mainstream, and the narrative focuses on classic Western themes of identity and heroism without explicitly critiquing traditional human identities or centering DEI themes.
Rango does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative and character arcs are entirely devoid of elements pertaining to sexual orientation or gender identity, resulting in a 'N/A' rating for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
The film features Beans as the primary female character, who is portrayed as resilient and capable. While she participates in action sequences, her combat actions primarily involve the use of firearms. There are no scenes depicting her or any other female character defeating male opponents in close-quarters physical combat.
Rango is an original animated film featuring characters created specifically for this production. There is no prior source material, historical basis, or previous adaptations from which character genders could have been established and subsequently altered.
Rango is an original animated film featuring anthropomorphic animal characters. There are no pre-existing human characters from source material, history, or previous installments whose race could have been changed.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources