Welcome to a world where time has become the ultimate currency. You stop aging at 25, but there's a catch: you're genetically-engineered to live only one more year, unless you can buy your way out of it. The rich "earn" ...
Welcome to a world where time has become the ultimate currency. You stop aging at 25, but there's a catch: you're genetically-engineered to live only one more year, unless you can buy your way out of it. The rich "earn" ...
The film's central thesis explicitly critiques extreme wealth inequality and the commodification of life under a hyper-capitalist system, advocating for revolutionary redistribution of resources to dismantle systemic oppression.
The film features some visible diversity in its supporting cast, but its main roles do not involve explicit race or gender swaps. The narrative primarily focuses on a critique of class inequality and a dystopian economic system, rather than explicitly addressing or critiquing traditional identities or specific DEI themes.
The film 'In Time' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative centers on a dystopian society where time is currency, focusing on class struggle and a heterosexual romance, with no discernible LGBTQ+ representation.
The film features Sylvia Weis as the primary female character involved in action sequences. Her victories against male opponents are consistently achieved through the use of firearms or strategic maneuvers, rather than direct physical combat, martial arts, or melee weapons.
In Time is an original film with characters created specifically for this story. There are no pre-existing characters from source material, history, or prior installments whose gender was changed for this adaptation.
In Time is an original science fiction film, not an adaptation of pre-existing source material or a biopic. Therefore, its characters were not established as any particular race prior to this film's creation, precluding the possibility of a race swap.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources