6.8
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Spinal Tap II: The End Continues (2025)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Progressive
Viewer Rating
Rating: 6.8
Overview
The now estranged bandmates of Spinal Tap are forced to reunite for one final concert, hoping it will solidify their place in the pantheon of rock 'n' roll.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Neutral
Christianity: Negative
Overview
The now estranged bandmates of Spinal Tap are forced to reunite for one final concert, hoping it will solidify their place in the pantheon of rock 'n' roll.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Progressive
Primary
The film is a comedic mockumentary primarily focused on rock culture and aging musicians, with no explicit political themes or ideological leanings presented in its narrative, making its core subject matter apolitical.
Spinal Tap II: The End Continues features visible diversity through the inclusion of a female drummer and LGBTQ+ representation. The narrative explicitly critiques male entitlement through a traditional male character's actions, which are directly challenged, reflecting a significant engagement with DEI themes.
Secondary
The film features Didi, a joyful drummer whose same-sex relationship is acknowledged through her girlfriend's presence. This inclusion is incidental, not deeply exploring LGBTQ+ themes, nor is it sensationalized. The portrayal is neutral, using the relationship for comedic commentary on another character rather than focusing on Didi's identity itself.
The film portrays Christian spirituality through Sister Jeanine Immaculata with a comedic tone, using her devotion and spiritual experiences as punchlines. The narrative treats religious elements as a source of humor rather than exploring them with seriousness or respect.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Established characters from the original film maintain their male gender portrayals. New characters introduced in the sequel are presented with their on-screen gender and do not have prior canonical genders to swap from.
The core legacy characters (Nigel Tufnel, David St. Hubbins, Derek Smalls) are portrayed by actors of the same race as their established identities. New characters introduced in the film, regardless of their ethnicity, do not qualify as race swaps per the definition, as they have no prior canonical racial depiction.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
N/A
6.8
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Progressive
6.5
Trolls
(2016)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
7.9
School of Rock
(2003)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
8.3
KPop Demon Hunters
(2025)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Progressive
7.7
Deadpool
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Neutral
Female Combat: Yes
Progressive
7.2
Cruella
(2021)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Progressive
6.7
Chocolat
(2000)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
7.4
One of Them Days
(2025)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
Leans Progressive
6.9
Nonnas
(2025)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Progressive
7.5
Deadpool 2
(2018)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Progressive
7.3
Deep Cover
(2025)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Progressive
7.8
The Punk Singer
(2013)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Progressive
7.6
Hercules
(1997)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
Progressive
7.8
Blazing Saddles
(1974)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
Leans Progressive
6.6
Eddington
(2025)
Political: Center
Diversity: High
Center
6.6
Lilo & Stitch
(2025)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: High
Progressive
8.3
Anora
(2024)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Progressive
7.1
Dora and the Search for Sol Dorado
(2025)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Progressive
8.0
Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
(2006)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: Moderate
LGBTQ: Negative
Progressive
7.2
Holes
(2003)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: High
Progressive
7.5
ParaNorman
(2012)
Political: Strong Left
Diversity: High
LGBTQ: Neutral