Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Life seems easy for picture-perfect couple Ivy and Theo: successful careers, a loving marriage, great kids. But beneath the façade of their supposed ideal life, a storm is brewing – as Theo's career nosedives while Ivy's own ambitions take off, a tinderbox of fierce competition and hidden resentment ignites.
Life seems easy for picture-perfect couple Ivy and Theo: successful careers, a loving marriage, great kids. But beneath the façade of their supposed ideal life, a storm is brewing – as Theo's career nosedives while Ivy's own ambitions take off, a tinderbox of fierce competition and hidden resentment ignites.
The film leans left due to its progressive cultural critique, which highlights shifting gender roles and female empowerment through its central characters and narrative, aligning with contemporary progressive values without explicit partisan messaging.
The movie explores DEI aspects through its portrayal of gender role reversals, social class dynamics, and a satirical critique of progressive cultural stereotypes. While it features some diversity in its supporting cast, its narrative approach is nuanced, using dark comedy to reflect on modern social and marital complexities rather than offering explicit DEI advocacy.
The film portrays an LGBTQ+ character, Amy, as a caricature of progressive, sexually fluid attitudes, using her identity for social satire within a context of toxic relationships. The depiction leans into stereotypes and serves to highlight character flaws and relational dysfunction, lacking nuanced or affirming representation.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film's main characters, Theo and Ivy Rose, along with other supporting roles, maintain the same genders as established in the original novel and previous film adaptation. No characters' on-screen gender differs from their source material.
The main characters, the Rose family, are cast with actors matching their original established race. Supporting characters of diverse backgrounds are introduced, but the provided information does not indicate they are race-swapped versions of previously established characters from the source material.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources