It's been five years since everything was awesome and the citizens are facing the huge new threat of Lego Duplo, invaders from outer space, wrecking everything faster than they can rebuild....
It's been five years since everything was awesome and the citizens are facing the huge new threat of Lego Duplo, invaders from outer space, wrecking everything faster than they can rebuild....
The film's central message promotes empathy, understanding, and compromise between differing perspectives and play styles, ultimately fostering family unity and balanced growth, which are universally positive and apolitical themes.
The movie features a diverse voice cast for its new characters and explores themes of acceptance and cooperation, subtly critiquing certain aspects of traditional masculinity. However, it does not explicitly recast traditionally white roles or center its narrative on a strong critique of traditional identities.
The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on broader themes of imagination, sibling relationships, and personal growth, without incorporating elements related to sexual orientation or gender identity.
The film features female characters like Lucy and Sweet Mayhem who participate in action sequences. However, their combat is primarily vehicle-based, involves building, or is against non-gendered robots or aliens. There are no clear instances of a female character defeating one or more male opponents in direct physical combat.
The film features returning characters from the first movie and established characters from other franchises, all of whom maintain their original genders. New characters introduced do not have prior canonical genders to swap from.
The primary characters are Lego minifigures, for whom the concept of human race does not apply. Live-action characters are consistent with prior portrayals or are new without established racial canon. No character established as one race is portrayed as another.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources