Apple TVBedtime for Bonzo (1951)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 6.0
Overview
College prof Peter Boyd tries to salvage his professional and personal reputation by using a lab chimp to prove that environment trumps heredity in behavioral development.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Apple TV
Google PlayBias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Overview
College prof Peter Boyd tries to salvage his professional and personal reputation by using a lab chimp to prove that environment trumps heredity in behavioral development.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Apple TVGoogle PlayDetailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film is a lighthearted comedy that uses the nature vs. nurture debate as a premise for humorous situations rather than engaging with it as a serious ideological conflict, resulting in a neutral political stance.
This 1951 comedy features a cast predominantly composed of white actors, reflecting the common casting practices of its time. The narrative focuses on a professor's experiment with a chimpanzee and does not engage with or critique traditional identities or incorporate explicit diversity, equity, and inclusion themes.
Secondary
The film "Bedtime for Bonzo" does not feature any discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its plot centers on a professor's experiment to raise a chimpanzee as a human, offering no relevant content for an LGBTQ+ portrayal analysis.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Bedtime for Bonzo (1951) is an original film, not an adaptation of pre-existing material with established characters. All characters were created for this specific production, thus precluding any instances of gender swapping from prior canon.
Bedtime for Bonzo is an original film from 1951, not an adaptation of pre-existing material or a biopic. Its characters were created for this specific production, meaning there is no prior canonical or historical race to be altered.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
6.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
User Ratings
5.5
5.9
Critic Ratings
6.7
N/A
More Like This
Traditional
7.2
The Parent Trap
(1998)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
The Princess Bride
(1987)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
Big
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Enchanted
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Megamind
(2010)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
Toy Story 3
(2010)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
The Sound of Music
(1965)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
Inside Out
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.7
Beauty and the Beast
(1991)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
9.0
Toy Story
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
In Good Company
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.9
Monster House
(2006)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
Mrs. Doubtfire
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
Intolerable Cruelty
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
6.9
The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Dan in Real Life
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.3
Crazy, Stupid, Love.
(2011)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Traditional
8.2
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Toy Story 2
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.8
Ratatouille
(2007)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low