Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
On a forest road in the Brandenburg March, village teacher Potsch accidentally encounters the distinguished Professor Menzel, who got stuck there in his car. In the conversation that ensues, Menzel and Pötsch quickly dis...
On a forest road in the Brandenburg March, village teacher Potsch accidentally encounters the distinguished Professor Menzel, who got stuck there in his car. In the conversation that ensues, Menzel and Pötsch quickly dis...
The film critiques the East German socialist state's manipulation of history and suppression of intellectual freedom, championing individual integrity and the pursuit of truth against ideological pressure, which aligns with skepticism of state power.
The movie 'Märkische Forschungen' features traditional casting, reflecting its East German setting and historical context with a predominantly white, German cast. Its narrative centers on critiques of academic bureaucracy and historical interpretation rather than engaging with themes of diversity, equity, or inclusion, or critiquing traditional identities.
The film 'Märkische Forschungen' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative is centered on a young academic's investigation into a deceased writer, serving as a satire on academic dishonesty and the East German system.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film is an adaptation of Günter de Bruyn's novel. Key characters, such as the protagonist Jochen Kühn and the poet Max von Schwedenow, maintain their established genders from the source material. There is no evidence of any character being portrayed as a different gender than their canonical or historical representation.
This 1982 East German film, an adaptation of a German novel, features characters whose race is consistently portrayed as white, aligning with the source material and historical context. There is no evidence of any character being depicted as a different race than canonically or historically established.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources