Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
The daily life of ordinary people of Shanghai apartment building: an unemployed person who tries not to lose face by concealing the loss of his job, a singer without an audience, a driver, a teacher, but also the owner of the building and his prodigal son.
The daily life of ordinary people of Shanghai apartment building: an unemployed person who tries not to lose face by concealing the loss of his job, a singer without an audience, a driver, a teacher, but also the owner of the building and his prodigal son.
The film explores the complex social and moral landscape of Shanghai during a period of rapid modernization, depicting the tension between traditional values and modern urban life, and the individual struggles within this transition, without explicitly advocating for a specific political ideology or solution.
The movie, a 1936 Chinese production, features a cast that is representative of its cultural context, without engaging in explicit race or gender swaps of roles traditionally associated with other demographics. Its narrative provides social commentary on the era's challenges and societal norms, but does not explicitly critique traditional identities or center on strong DEI themes.
Based on the provided input, there is no information available to assess the presence or portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters or themes in 'Old and New Shanghai'. Consequently, a determination of its net impact is not feasible.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
There is no widely established source material, prior adaptations, or historical figures associated with the 1936 film "Old and New Shanghai" that would indicate a character's gender was changed from a previously established canon.
Old and New Shanghai (1936) is a Chinese film from the 1930s. There is no indication that its characters were established as a different race in prior source material or history before this film's production. Therefore, no race swap occurred.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources