During the reign of the Tang dynasty in China, a secret organization called "The House of the Flying Daggers" rises and opposes the government. A police officer called Leo sends officer Jin to investigate a young dancer ...
During the reign of the Tang dynasty in China, a secret organization called "The House of the Flying Daggers" rises and opposes the government. A police officer called Leo sends officer Jin to investigate a young dancer ...
The film critiques government corruption and oppression through the lens of a rebellion, but its primary focus is on the tragic romantic drama and the personal dilemmas of its characters, offering no specific ideological solution or systemic critique that would align it with a particular political bias.
The film features a cast and narrative that are entirely traditional to its Chinese Wuxia genre and setting. It does not involve any recasting of traditionally white roles, nor does its narrative engage with or critique Western traditional identities, as these concepts are not relevant to its cultural context.
The film features Mei, a highly skilled martial artist, who repeatedly engages in and wins close-quarters physical fights against multiple male opponents, including imperial guards and soldiers, using daggers and hand-to-hand combat.
House of Flying Daggers does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The story centers on a traditional heterosexual love triangle and martial arts drama, rendering the LGBTQ+ portrayal as not applicable.
House of Flying Daggers features an original story and characters created specifically for the film. There are no pre-existing canonical or historical characters whose gender was altered for this adaptation.
This film is an original story set in 9th-century China. It does not adapt pre-existing source material with established character races, nor does it depict historical figures. All major characters were created for this film and are portrayed by actors of East Asian descent, consistent with the setting.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources