Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
A scientist taints his mother's scientific experiment with his own drug that transforms pain into a pleasurable experience. Unfortunately for the three women involved in the experiment, the drug works a little bit too well.
A scientist taints his mother's scientific experiment with his own drug that transforms pain into a pleasurable experience. Unfortunately for the three women involved in the experiment, the drug works a little bit too well.
The film's primary focus on extreme body horror, psychological breakdown, and transgressive violence lacks a clear political agenda or a discernible problem/solution framework that aligns with specific ideological viewpoints. Its themes are largely apolitical, centering on visceral shock and existential dread rather than societal critique or advocacy.
The movie features traditional casting for a Japanese production, with an entirely Japanese cast and no explicit race or gender swaps of roles. Its narrative focuses on extreme horror and psychological themes, without engaging in critical portrayals of traditional identities or incorporating explicit DEI critiques.
The film features Risa, a lesbian character whose identity is problematically intertwined with themes of obsession, violence, and psychological disturbance. Her portrayal lacks dignity and reinforces harmful stereotypes, as her sexuality is depicted as a component of her pathology and a catalyst for grotesque events, resulting in a net negative impact.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Splatter: Naked Blood is an original film from 1996, not an adaptation or a reboot featuring pre-existing characters. All characters were created for this specific film, thus lacking any prior canonical or historical gender to be swapped from.
This is an original Japanese horror film from 1996. There are no prior canonical or historical character depictions to establish a baseline for race, thus no race swap can be identified.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources