Richard Haywood, a Californian high school's coolest kid, secretly teams up with another rich kid in his class, brilliant nerd Justin 'Bonaparte' Pendleton, whose erudition, specially in forensic matters, allows them to ...
Richard Haywood, a Californian high school's coolest kid, secretly teams up with another rich kid in his class, brilliant nerd Justin 'Bonaparte' Pendleton, whose erudition, specially in forensic matters, allows them to ...
The film primarily functions as a psychological thriller, focusing on individual psychopathy and the pursuit of justice. It does not explicitly promote or critique specific political ideologies, maintaining a neutral stance on broader societal issues despite touching on themes of privilege.
The movie features a predominantly white cast with no intentional race or gender swaps of traditional roles. While the antagonists are white males, their negative portrayal is not framed as a critique of traditional identities but rather as individual moral corruption, and the narrative does not center on explicit DEI themes.
The film portrays an intense, possibly homoerotic, bond between its two psychopathic antagonists, linking their queer-coded relationship directly to their shared depravity and motive for murder. This problematic depiction associates queer intimacy with villainy and destructive behavior, offering no affirming counter-narrative and thus resulting in a net negative impact.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Murder by Numbers is an original screenplay, not an adaptation of existing source material or a reboot of legacy characters. All characters were created for this film, thus there are no instances of a character's gender being changed from a prior established version.
Murder by Numbers is an original film with characters created specifically for this production. There is no prior source material, historical record, or previous installment from which characters' races could have been established and subsequently changed.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources