In 400 AD, the Roman Empire extends to Britain and the Romans become impressed with the fight skills of the warrior Sarmatian people, which are spared, but have to send their sons to serve Rome in the cavalry for fifteen...
In 400 AD, the Roman Empire extends to Britain and the Romans become impressed with the fight skills of the warrior Sarmatian people, which are spared, but have to send their sons to serve Rome in the cavalry for fifteen...
The film consciously balances critiques of imperial power with themes of national defense and the establishment of a just, unified society under strong leadership, preventing a clear alignment with either progressive or conservative ideologies.
The movie features a predominantly white European cast without intentional race or gender swaps of traditionally white roles. Its narrative positively frames traditional identities, focusing on the heroism and leadership of its male protagonists, with no explicit DEI themes central to the story.
The film features Guinevere, a skilled warrior, who actively participates in close-quarters combat. She is depicted using a sword to fight and overcome several male Saxon opponents during the final confrontation.
The film 'King Arthur' (2004) does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative is centered on heterosexual relationships and the camaraderie of male knights, with no elements that could be interpreted as LGBTQ+ representation.
The film adapts the King Arthur legend, portraying all major characters, such as Arthur, Lancelot, and Guinevere, with their historically and mythologically established genders. No instances of a character being depicted as a different gender from their source material were found.
The film's main characters, including King Arthur and his knights, are portrayed by actors whose race aligns with the traditional and historical depictions of these legendary figures. No race swaps were identified.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources