3.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
The Indian Chief and the Seidlitz Powder (1901)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 3.0
Overview
An inventive use of slow-motion filming helps hammer home the gag as an unconvincing 'Indian chief' hopes to dissolve some trapped wind with a popular brand of indigestion powder.
Starring Cast
Bias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Overview
An inventive use of slow-motion filming helps hammer home the gag as an unconvincing 'Indian chief' hopes to dissolve some trapped wind with a popular brand of indigestion powder.
Starring Cast
Detailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's core subject matter is apolitical slapstick comedy centered around a prank, and its narrative does not engage with or promote any specific political ideology.
This early silent film features traditional casting practices of its era, where a non-white character role would have been played by a white actor, without any intentional DEI-driven casting. The narrative frames traditional identities neutrally or positively, while the non-white character is presented stereotypically and as the subject of ridicule, indicating an absence of DEI themes or critique.
Secondary
This early silent film is a simple gag comedy depicting a man's humorous reaction to a fizzy drink. There are no identifiable LGBTQ+ characters, themes, or plot points present in the narrative, leading to a determination of N/A for LGBTQ+ portrayal.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
This early trick film from 1901 features original characters without any prior canonical, historical, or widely established gender. Therefore, no gender swap can be identified.
This 1901 film is an original production, not an adaptation or a biopic. Its characters, including 'The Indian Chief,' do not have a prior established race from source material, previous installments, or real-world history that predates this film. Therefore, no race swap can be identified.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
User Ratings
N/A
3.0
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Traditional
8.1
Hot Fuzz
(2007)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Notting Hill
(1999)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.6
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
(1975)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
Norbert Smith: A Life
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Emma.
(2020)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.0
The Gentlemen
(2020)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Life of Brian
(1979)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
7.0
Bridget Jones's Diary
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
8.4
The Banshees of Inisherin
(2022)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.0
The Madness of King George
(1994)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.3
Bobby Thompson: The Little Waster
(1982)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Bridget Jones's Baby
(2016)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Center
7.2
Kingsman: The Secret Service
(2015)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Female Combat: Yes
Leans Traditional
7.1
About Time
(2013)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Traditional
8.5
The King's Speech
(2010)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
0.0
At Last! That Awful Tooth
(1902)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
1984
(1956)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Downton Abbey: A New Era
(2022)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Positive
Leans Traditional
7.5
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Santos Dumont Explaining His Air Ship to the Hon. C.S. Rolls
(1901)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low