Vick and the bears find themselves stuck in the ancient past surrounded by gigantic animals who all seem to have one thing in mind: lunch. When our heroes get separated, Briar meets up with a young wolf named Feifei, who...
Vick and the bears find themselves stuck in the ancient past surrounded by gigantic animals who all seem to have one thing in mind: lunch. When our heroes get separated, Briar meets up with a young wolf named Feifei, who...
The film is rated neutral as its core narrative focuses on universal themes of survival, friendship, and ingenuity in an apolitical prehistoric adventure setting, without promoting specific political ideologies.
This animated feature from China primarily showcases animal protagonists and human characters that reflect its cultural origin. The narrative focuses on adventure and survival, portraying its main characters neutrally or positively without critiquing traditional identities or explicitly incorporating DEI themes.
This animated children's film focuses on prehistoric adventures and themes of friendship and courage. There are no discernible LGBTQ+ characters or themes present in the narrative, resulting in a determination of N/A for its portrayal of LGBTQ+ content.
The film features female characters like Brambles and Patches, who participate in action sequences primarily involving chases, escapes, and environmental challenges. However, there are no scenes depicting a female character achieving victory in close-quarters physical combat against one or more male opponents through skill, strength, or martial arts.
This film is an original story within an existing animated franchise. The established main characters retain their canonical genders, and new characters introduced are original to this installment, not gender-swapped versions of previously established characters from the Boonie Bears universe.
The film features anthropomorphic animal characters, not human characters with an established race. Therefore, the concept of a 'race swap' as defined does not apply.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources