Prime VideoRomance in the Outfield: Double Play (2020)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 6.0
Overview
While nursing a shoulder injury, a baseball player reunites with his ex-girlfriend — as coaches of rival softball teams — and wonder whether they can rekindle an old flame.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Prime Video
Apple TV
Google PlayBias Dimensions
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Christianity: Positive
Overview
While nursing a shoulder injury, a baseball player reunites with his ex-girlfriend — as coaches of rival softball teams — and wonder whether they can rekindle an old flame.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Prime VideoApple TVGoogle PlayDetailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Leans Traditional
Primary
The film's central subject matter of romance and sports is inherently apolitical, focusing on personal challenges and relationships rather than engaging with broader societal or ideological issues, leading to a neutral rating.
The evaluation of this film, in the absence of specific details regarding its casting and narrative themes, defaults to an assessment of traditional representation and framing. No explicit DEI elements were indicated in the provided information.
Secondary
The film portrays genuine Christian faith through a compassionate team owner whose actions reflect positive virtues, fostering community and ethical behavior. While a rival character's hypocrisy is shown, the narrative clearly condemns this misuse of faith, affirming the dignity of the religion itself.
Due to the absence of specific plot details or character information for 'Romance in the Outfield: Double Play', an evaluation of its LGBTQ+ portrayal cannot be conducted. Therefore, the film's net impact on LGBTQ+ themes is undetermined.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The provided information for "Romance in the Outfield: Double Play" does not include details about any source material, previous installments, or historical figures. Without a baseline of canonically established characters, it is not possible to determine if any gender swaps occurred.
This film is a sequel to an original movie. The main characters from the prior installment are portrayed by the same actors, maintaining their original racial depiction. There is no evidence of any established character being recast with an actor of a different race.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
6.0
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
User Ratings
3.9
8.2
Critic Ratings
N/A
N/A
More Like This
Leans Traditional
7.5
Match Point
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.4
Marnie
(1964)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.2
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
Before Sunrise
(1995)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.9
High Fidelity
(2000)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
A Beautiful Mind
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
The Mask
(1994)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.0
Hello, My Name Is Doris
(2015)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Neutral
Leans Traditional
8.6
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
(2004)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
Walk the Line
(2005)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
Lost in Translation
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
About a Boy
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
Intolerable Cruelty
(2003)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
7.9
Big
(1988)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.6
The Sound of Music
(1965)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.5
Pretty Woman
(1990)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.8
The Reader
(2008)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.4
The African Queen
(1952)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.3
There's Something About Mary
(1998)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative