Briar and Bramble lose their mother at a very young age due to mysterious circumstances. Many years later, when an older female bear shows up on the scene, the Bear Brothers are determined to find out the truth once and ...
Briar and Bramble lose their mother at a very young age due to mysterious circumstances. Many years later, when an older female bear shows up on the scene, the Bear Brothers are determined to find out the truth once and ...
The film's dominant themes align with progressive values, primarily focusing on environmental protection and the guardianship of nature against human exploitation, which is the decisive factor for its rating.
This animated film, originating from China, features a cast of anthropomorphic animals and human characters consistent with its cultural context. The narrative centers on themes of environmentalism and family, without explicitly critiquing traditional identities or making DEI themes central to its plot.
Boonie Bears: Guardian Code, an animated film primarily for children, does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The narrative focuses on adventure, friendship, and environmental protection, without engaging with queer identity in any capacity.
The film primarily features male characters, including the bears Bramble and Briar, and Vick, engaging in physical conflicts against male antagonists. No significant female character is depicted winning in close-quarters physical combat against one or more male opponents.
The film is part of a long-running animated franchise. All established main and recurring characters, such as Briar, Bramble, and Vick, retain their original genders. New characters introduced in this installment do not replace or alter the gender of any prior established characters.
The film is an animated continuation of a Chinese franchise. Its characters, both animal and human, maintain consistent racial depictions with prior installments and the franchise's origin. No established character has been portrayed as a different race.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources