When Eddie breaks into a luxury SUV, he steps into a deadly trap set by William, a self-proclaimed vigilante delivering his own brand of twisted justice. With no means of escape, Eddie must fight to survive in a ride where escape is an illusion, survival is a nightmare, and justice shifts into high gear.
When Eddie breaks into a luxury SUV, he steps into a deadly trap set by William, a self-proclaimed vigilante delivering his own brand of twisted justice. With no means of escape, Eddie must fight to survive in a ride where escape is an illusion, survival is a nightmare, and justice shifts into high gear.
The film explores the complex interplay of vigilantism, economic desperation, and societal frustration through a morality play, consciously balancing competing viewpoints and focusing on human responses rather than endorsing a specific political ideology.
The movie *Locked* incorporates DEI-relevant themes primarily through its exploration of socioeconomic disparity and the criminal justice system, humanizing a low-level criminal driven by financial desperation. While it indirectly critiques power dynamics, the film does not explicitly address racial or broader cultural diversity in its main cast or deeply engage with systemic DEI frameworks beyond socioeconomic factors, maintaining a focus on psychological tension.
The major characters, originally from an Argentine film and thus presumably Latin American in ethnicity and appearance, are portrayed by European-descended actors (Swedish and Welsh) in the American adaptation, representing a shift in racial portrayal.
Locked (2025) is a psychological thriller that does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The film's narrative centers on class conflict and survival, with no indication of LGBTQ+ representation in its plot, character interactions, or overarching themes.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
The film *Locked* (2025) is an adaptation of the 2019 thriller *4x4*. Character genders, including main roles, are consistent with the original source material, with no evidence of gender-swapped roles.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources