Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
Following the routine of Roseli, the film aims to expose the adversities that impregnate the daily lives of black women from the outskirts of São Paulo who struggle to provide sustenance not only for themselves but especially for their children.
Following the routine of Roseli, the film aims to expose the adversities that impregnate the daily lives of black women from the outskirts of São Paulo who struggle to provide sustenance not only for themselves but especially for their children.
The film's political bias cannot be assessed due to the complete absence of any plot details, character information, or thematic content. Therefore, a neutral rating of 0 is assigned by default.
Based on the limited information provided, the movie 'Deus' does not exhibit explicit DEI characteristics in its casting or narrative framing. Without specific details on character representation or thematic content, the film is assessed as having a neutral approach to diversity and inclusion.
The film critically examines the institutional aspects of Christianity, highlighting perceived hypocrisies or dogmatic rigidities that lead to negative outcomes for characters. The narrative suggests that adherence to strict religious dogma can be detrimental.
Based on the provided information, the film 'Deus (movie)' does not contain identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Consequently, there is no specific portrayal to evaluate within the scope of this framework.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Information regarding "Deus" (2017) does not indicate it is an adaptation of a pre-existing work with established characters. Therefore, its characters are presumed original to the film, precluding a gender swap as defined.
The provided information for the film "Deus" (2017) does not include any details about source material, pre-existing characters, or historical figures. Without a baseline for character races, it is not possible to identify a race swap.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources