Apple TVRules of Engagement (2000)
Bias Rating
Analyzing...
Traditional
Viewer Rating
Rating: 5.2
Overview
A Marine Colonel is brought to court-martial after ordering his men to fire on demonstrators surrounding the American embassy in Yemen.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Apple TV
Google PlayBias Dimensions
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Moderate
Islam: Negative
Overview
A Marine Colonel is brought to court-martial after ordering his men to fire on demonstrators surrounding the American embassy in Yemen.
Starring Cast
Where to watch
Apple TVGoogle PlayDetailed Bias Analysis
Analyzing...
Traditional
Primary
The film's central thesis explicitly promotes the vindication of a military officer's decisive action in combat against a hostile foreign crowd, and the condemnation of a corrupt US government that attempts to scapegoat him for political expediency, strongly aligning with conservative values.
The movie features visible diversity in its cast, including a prominent Black lead, but does not engage in explicit race or gender swaps of traditionally white roles. Its narrative offers a subtle critique of a corrupt power figure, but DEI themes are not explicitly central to the story.
Secondary
The film portrays a large crowd of Yemeni civilians, implicitly Muslim, as an undifferentiated, hostile, and violent mob chanting anti-American slogans and posing a direct threat. The narrative largely validates the protagonist's decision to fire upon them, reinforcing a negative stereotype of a hostile 'other' without offering significant counterbalancing nuance or humanization.
The film 'Rules of Engagement' does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Its narrative is solely focused on a military court-martial and the complexities of combat ethics, resulting in no portrayal of LGBTQ+ issues.
The movie does not contain any action or adventure elements.
Rules of Engagement is an original screenplay, not an adaptation of existing material with pre-established characters. All characters were created for this film, therefore no gender swaps occurred.
Rules of Engagement is an original film with characters created for this specific production. There is no prior source material, historical record, or previous installment where the characters' races were established differently. Therefore, no race swap occurred.
Viewer Rating Breakdown
5.2
Viewer Rating
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources
User Ratings
6.4
6.2
Critic Ratings
3.6
4.5
More Like This
Traditional
7.9
The Lives of a Bengal Lancer
(1935)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.1
Murderers Among Us: The Simon Wiesenthal Story
(1989)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.7
The Caine Mutiny
(1954)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.8
The Longest Day
(1962)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.6
Enigma
(2001)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.4
The Deer Hunter
(1978)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.6
The Lost Squadron
(1932)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.5
The Great Escape
(1963)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
7.7
Sands of Iwo Jima
(1950)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
The Patriot
(2000)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
8.1
Inglourious Basterds
(2009)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
6.7
Coach Carter
(2005)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Traditional
8.0
Wings
(1927)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low
Traditional
8.7
Gone with the Wind
(1939)
Political: Strong Right
Diversity: Low
Center
7.5
The Outpost
(2020)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Moderate
Leans Traditional
7.2
The Count of Monte Cristo
(2002)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.7
M*A*S*H
(1970)
Political: Leans Left
Diversity: Low
LGBTQ: Negative
Leans Traditional
8.4
Dunkirk
(2017)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Leans Traditional
7.5
The Fall of the Roman Empire
(1964)
Political: Center
Diversity: Low
Traditional
6.7
The Charge of the Light Brigade
(1936)
Political: Leans Right
Diversity: Low