In the wilderness of British Columbia, two hunters are tracked and viciously murdered by Aaron Hallam. A former Special Operations instructor is approached and asked to apprehend Hallam—his former student—who has 'gone rogue' after suffering severe battle stress from his time in Kosovo.
In the wilderness of British Columbia, two hunters are tracked and viciously murdered by Aaron Hallam. A former Special Operations instructor is approached and asked to apprehend Hallam—his former student—who has 'gone rogue' after suffering severe battle stress from his time in Kosovo.
The film explores the severe psychological impact of military training and combat on a soldier, but frames the central conflict as a highly individualized, primal confrontation between a mentor and his rogue student, rather than offering systemic critiques or political solutions.
The film features visible diversity in its main cast with a prominent non-white actor. Its narrative, however, does not explicitly critique traditional identities or center on DEI themes, instead focusing on the psychological impact of military service.
The film does not feature any identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or themes. Consequently, there is no portrayal to evaluate within the provided framework, resulting in an N/A rating.
The film primarily focuses on two male characters engaged in a cat-and-mouse chase. While female characters are present, none are depicted engaging in or winning close-quarters physical combat against male opponents.
The Hunted (2003) is an original film not based on pre-existing source material, historical figures, or a prior franchise. All characters were created for this specific movie, meaning there are no established canonical genders from other works to be swapped.
The Hunted (2003) is an original film with characters created specifically for this production. There are no pre-existing source materials, historical figures, or prior adaptations from which characters' races could have been established and subsequently changed.
Combines user and critic ratings from four sources